The Presidential Choice Of Daley To Focus Other Officials Towards Economy

Obama Choice of Daley to Focus Staff on Economy. Yes, President Barack Obama announced the appointment of Bill Daley as the new White House chief of staff. He is sixty-two years of age and will take charge of talking to the media as representative of President Obama, especially about economic matters. He has a background in politics as the son of Richard J. Daley, the man who was mayor of Chicago for twenty-one years. His brother, Richard now serves as mayor of Chicago.

His experience as a member on the executive committee for JPMorgan Chase & Co., chairman of the election committee for Al Gore when he made his run for the White House and position on the board of directors of Boeing prepared him for this challenging position.

Gene Sperling is appointed by the president to lead the National Economic Council. He has served in that position before. When Bill Clinton was president, Sperling held the same position. One of the things he fought for at that time was raising the visas issued to 195,000 as a maximum. Currently the maximum is 85,000. This H-IB visa gave an advantage to businesses that did offshore outsourcing.

That had the unfortunate effect of shipping American jobs overseas. It will be interesting to see how Sperling now handles this H-IB visa situation. He must find a solution that will be amicable to the U. S. Labor Department as well as businesses concerned with outsourcing.

Secretary Timothy Geithner, as leader of the National Economic Council, will concentrate on improving the economic recovery. His background as an economist and banker precedes his career as a civil servant. He has also served as President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

He will deal with restructuring the financial system, the recovery of the automobile industry and necessary tax changes. He will negotiate financial issues with foreign country leaders. These three new appointments of Daley, Sperling and Geithner will bring rejuvenation to the economy and address the national debt that is now a staggering amount of money.

Members of Congress, Republicans and Democrats alike, are familiar with Sperling and Daley. They are also familiar with big business and labor groups. An anonymous source reported that these working relationships are good. For example, Daley received endorsement from the U. S. Chamber of Commerce and the Business Roundtable in D. C.

Daley was described as a potentially beneficial chief of staff by Senate Republican leader, Mitch McConnel. He praised his experience in corporate America. His position as president of SBC Communications and member of the executive directors board at Boeing were both successful. He has been at JPMorgan since 2007. On the detrimental side, he was a board member of Fannie Mae, which is responsible for many people losing their homes to foreclosure. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac approved ill-advised loans, which led to the mortgage crisis.

It is the expectation that Daley will resign from his position at JPMorgan & Chase. We can expect him to turn his attention to the financial problems at hand. President Obama made a wise choice as far as the opinions of top leaders from both political parties are concerned. He will be elucidating his views on the major news shows to outline a workable plan to deal with jobs and the national debt. Evelia K. Roskovensky

If you are interested in online trading in the stock market, then we have some techniques that will help you out. These techniques will help to make you successful in your life.

John Boehner Is A Crying Baby Motivated By His Own Mythology

Those who pay attention to politics have surely noticed that soon to be Speaker John Boehner is a crying baby. One asks whether this is a strategy meant to gain sympathy for his political goals, or if he is dangerously unstable. Either politics have changed so that it is now alright for men to cry, or the media is giving the Weeper of the House a free ride.

Considering the fact that Johnny will be the leader of Congress, some may feel that blubbering in public is somehow inappropriate. American citizens should ask if they are comfortable with the third person removed from possession of the nuclear football being inclined to uncontrollable mood changes.

The topic reported to cause him to break into tears being any mention of the American Dream, Boehner experiences a loss of control and major facial contortions. For some one showing no interest in helping those whose priority is stretching their insufficient pay check, his pretense to caring about the welfare of the children is enough to make a strong man weep.

Whether the tears come sincerely from that hard heart, or if they act as a form of visual interference, disrupting the watchers ability to make critical judgments, is open to speculation. Crying has gained acceptance as a tactic for those who tell their adversaries to man up.

Blubbering Johnny’s outbursts may have some connection to his fondness for alcohol or he may be on medication which causes emotional instability. As if Speaker Pelosi would be given a pass for crying, or Senator Muskie was considered unfit for office because he wept over remarks made about his wife. But macho right wing John can express his feminine side since his emotions are so grandly patriotic.

Prudent minds may think it best to give the benefit of the doubt as to reasons why John Boehner is a crying baby. Some say he is over come with emotion over his success in reaching the American Dream. Others think it more likely that he weeps for any lost opportunity to give more taxpayers money to his country club dwelling friends.

Get the low down on reasons why you should be worried that John Boehner is a crying baby now in our complete review of all you need to know about boehner strategies.. This article, John Boehner Is A Crying Baby Motivated By His Own Mythology has free reprint rights.

Rio De Janerio Wins 2016 Summer Olympic Games

South America will host the Summer Olympic Games for the first time in 2016, as Rio De Janeiro, Brazil was awarded the honor on Friday. Rio beat out the US choice of Chicago, Illinois along with Tokyo, Japan and Madrid, Spain to earn the right to host the games. Despite a high pressure effort from the American power elite–including President Barack Obama and TV gabfest queen Oprah Winfrey–Chicago was the first city eliminated from contention. Tokyo was the next to go, before Rio got the nod over Madrid in the final round of balloting.

Bookmakers offered odds on the host city choice, with Rio listed as second favorite at +200. Chicago had been the wagering favorite at most books, particularly after President Obama got involved personally in the US bid effort. Chicago was bet as high as a -300 favorite, while Madrid and Tokyo were priced in the +250 range. Some suggest that Tokyo didnt deserve to have such short odds, but was the beneficiary of regional pride from the notoriously enthusiastic betting population of Japan. Despite some media attention to the betting odds, bookmakers reported that they didn’t receive a lot of action on the event.

Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, President of Brazil, got the better of his US counterpart Barack Obama The Brazilian leader stressed the unfairness that South America had never hosted the games in his speech to the committee;

“It is a time to address this imbalance. It is time to light the Olympic cauldron in a tropical country.”

The Olympic committee was apparently swayed by this presentation and paid no mind to Rios many downsides. It is without a doubt the most dangerous of the finalist cities, where drug cartels and armed bands of thugs roam without impunity. Well do to Rio citizens are used to removing watches and jewelry before they drive anywhere lest they be targeted by carjacking brigands. Rios murder rate is also one of the highest in the world. Brazilian bid officials have stressed that security will be a priority at the games and it better be lest the Olympics turn into a bloodbath.

Some IOC members suggested that the summary dismissal of Chicagos bid was more of a rebuke of the notoriously corrupt USOC. The last two Olympics held in the US were tainted by crime and corruption. The’96 Atlanta Olympics were disrupted by a terrorist bombing, while the 2002 Salt Lake City Winter Games were marred by a well known bribery and corruption scandal. Some suggested that US President Obama’s quick and perfunctory visit was taken as more of an insult by the delegates than anything else.

Ross Everett is a widely published freelance sports writer and respected authority on football betting. His writing has appeared on a variety of sports sites including sports news and sportsbook directory sites. He lives in Las Vegas with three Jack Russell Terriers and an emu. He is currently working on an autobiography of former interior secretary James Watt.

How Banning Sports Betting Undermines The Constitution

The Federal ban on sports betting has been blasted by anyone who knows anything about the subject for a number of different reasons. Though the US professional leagues suggest that sports betting threatens the integrity of their games, the opposite is the case. The professional bookmaking industry is usually where any type of compromised or fixed game is discovered. Ultimately, the best case for legal sports betting is Constitutional.

Unfortunately, the Congress of the United States has shown very little respect for the Constitution in recent years. Were it to abide strictly by the role outlined for it by the founding fathers, the Legislative Branch of our government would have to relinquish any number of its powers in a variety of areas. The primary problem with our Congress is that it has increasingly become a collection of career politicians rather than a body representative of its constituency. As a result, the overriding concern of the average Senator or Congressman is increasing the power that he is able to wield, and as a result the power that his body is able to bring to bear. Most problematic for you and I, every increase in power at the Federal level must be brought about by a usurpation of state and local sovereignty and, more alarmingly, personal liberty.

The Federal prohibition of sports wagering which was enacted a few years back is of very dubious Constitutionality. Were it not for the grandfather clause, which allowed it to remain legal in jurisdictions in which it already existed, it would have certainly been struck down as unconstitutional on a number of different fronts. Ironically, the gambling industry supported this bill in the pre-Internet era.

Unfortunately, the mere fact that a proposed law or initiative is unconstitutional offers little protection for the citizenry. In fact, the concept of state sovereignty is one of the most important–and most abused–in the Constitution:

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Under the 10th Amendment, unless the power in question has been expressly given to the Federal government by the Constitution, and/or unless it has expressly been prohibited to the states to govern as it sees fit. If an individual state chooses not to regulate a certain activity, it is the right of each individual citizen to make their own decision.

So, you should be asking yourself at this point, where exactly does the Constitution delegate to the Federal government the right to make policy on sports gambling? The answer is that it doesnt, and it is very questionable that they have the Constitutional authority to do so. The sanctimonious blowhards who oppose sports betting would like to think they know best, but fortunately for all freedom loving Americans the founding fathers would beg to differ.

Sports gambling may seem a minimally important issue to some, but the erosion of liberty is an incremental danger. The danger to broader concepts of personal liberty may seem a million miles away, but with each additional law intended to protect us from this or that the Federal government becomes larger and more powerful and the rights of the sovereign states”and the individuals that comprise them”are shrinking and being weakened.

Ross Everett is a freelance writer and highly respected authority on NFL football betting. His writing has appeared on a variety of sports sites including sportsbooks and sportsbook directory sites. He lives in Las Vegas with three Jack Russell Terriers and a kangaroo. He is currently working on an autobiography of former interior secretary James Watt.